Technology

Ex-India cricketer calls Shubman Gill snub ‘damage control’, says selection ‘got carried away’ | Cricket News

Ex-India cricketer calls Shubman Gill snub 'damage control' and says selection got 'carried away'.
Shubman Gill (Photo by Matt King/Getty Images)

Sanjay Manjrekar didn’t just react to India’s squad for the 2026 T20 World Cup – he used X to frame it as a tacit admission of a previous mistake. In a sharp post, Manjrekar suggested this Shubman GillThe omission is not a bold move but a corrective step by decision-makers trying to make amends for a misstep following the England tour. This connection to England is significant: Gill had an exceptional 2025 Test series there, scoring 754 runs, a tally that might baffle even the most form-conscious decision-makers.

Contribution by Sanjay Manjrekar

Contribution by Sanjay Manjrekar

Still, Manjrekar’s observation is clear: success in Tests does not automatically guarantee a place in T20 cricket, especially in a World Cup season where defined roles carry more weight than reputation. India’s squad selection clearly reflects this mindset. The team has two wicketkeeping options – Sanju Samson and Ishan Kishan – both of whom can open. There is a powerful opening option Abhishek Sharma and a late-inning finisher Rinku SinghThis signals the focus of the selection on specialists for certain phases of the game.

Inside story on why Shubman Gill was REMOVED from India’s T20I World Cup squad

Even Ajit Agarkar‘s explanation reflects this logic. He spoke of there being a “lack of small runs” and stressed the need to balance combinations – opting for a keeper at the top comes at the expense of excluding a pure batsman. This argument becomes even more convincing when Gill’s recent T20I form is taken into account: he has not scored 50 in his last 18 innings and is also struggling with a foot injury. What may have started as an emotional misstep is now a pragmatic correction. Manjrekar’s contribution underlines a broader shift in India’s approach: the squad is no longer about selecting the 15 best players, but filling 15 predefined roles for the tournament. Management has made it clear that even high-profile players can be left out if the team schedule doesn’t leave room for them. This philosophy prioritizes structure and role-specific strategy over star power and signals a calculated, methodical approach to the World Cup.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *